In addition the appeal addresses the issues raised by the Commission concerning the need to match existing Bell urban broadband services; Bell calls this the Urban Service Comparability Requirement.
To meet these requirements Bell amended the original application (created a new application?) with significant increases in monthly data limits (Caps) and an usage insurance option of $5.00 per month for an additional 40 GB. This is the same feature available to current DSL subscribers. This means a consumer could get up to a 7 Mbps download with a 65 GB cap for $46.95 plus taxes and fees.
These changes address my major concerns with the original proposal. If the Bell ends up being allowed to implement this solution, I believe it will satisfy the majority of users in the Algoma District Deferral Account areas.
A COMPARISON THE ORIGINAL AND PROPOSED SPEED AND RATE STRUCTURE
Original HSPA Broadband Service Proposal | Proposed HSPA+ Retail Broadband Services | ||
Province | Ontario | ||
Service Name | N/A | Home Zone Wireless | Home Zone Wireless Plus |
Monthly Rate | $31.95 | $31.95 | $41.95 |
Download Speed | Up to 2 Mbps | Up to 2Mbps | Up to 7 Mbps |
Upload Speed | Up to 800 Kbps | Up to 1 Mbps | Up to 3 Mbps |
Monthly Usage Allowance | 2 GB | 2 GB | 25 GB |
Monthly Charge for Additional Usage | $2.50/GB | $2.50/GB, maximum of $30 per month | |
Usage Insurance | N/A | $5.00 per month for extra 40 GB | |
Activation Fee | $35.00 | $29.95 | |
Hardware | Turbo Stick provided at no charge | Turbo Hub: $3.95 monthly rental fee | |
Term | Monthly | Monthly | |
The Bell appeal submission proposes the following timeline: - “Interested parties would have 30 days from the date of this Application (e.g., no later than 20 October 2010) to comment and the Company [Bell] would have 10 days thereafter (e.g., no later than 1 November 2010) to file its reply.”
Furthermore “ …Company requests that the Commission confirm in its forthcoming process that it will issue its decision in respect of this Application no later than 90 days from the date of Decision 2010-637, or by 29 November 2010 in order to preserve the Company's rights pursuant to petition the Governor in Council for the review, variation and rescission of the DSL Technology Directive pursuant to section 12 of the Act.”
I believe the CRTC is now on the horns of a dilemma: if they rule against Bell, then Bell will petition the Governor in Council (i.e. the Federal Cabinet); if they rule in favour of Bell, one or more of the other HSPA or vested interest parties will appeal or take legal action.
It will be interesting to watch Bell explain how it can offer this level of service for Deferral Account areas at the prices proposed compared to the prices it charges its regular HSPA data customers in other areas.
