Wednesday, 4 June 2014

Rocket Hub Update

This is an update on the blog entry "Where are the Rocket Hubs?".

Rogers advised Tbaytel on 28 May 2014 that they would no longer be marketing the Rocket Hubs (Netcomm data hubs) effective immediately.  It seems there was no advance warning of this action.

Whether or not Rogers offered Tbaytel a replacement hardware option or Tbaytel was wary of renewing a single source supply chain is unclear.  In any case, it appears Tbaytel will maintain a portable Internet choice and  is actively searching for a hardware replacement to the Rocket Hub.

As indicated in the previous blog entry, the Rogers LTE Rocket Mobile Hotspot - Sierra Wireless AirCard 763S currently offered by Rogers may very well serve as a data hub replacement from a technical point of view. There are options available for the basic model such as external antennas and docking router unit that allow the Mobile Hotspot to mimic most features of the Rocket Hub. The big shortcoming of the Mobile Hotspots is that they are not 700 MHz compatible. 

The outstanding question is whether or not the Flex Rate Plans for Hubs will be applicable to Mobile Hotspot models configured as a hub or will the Tablets, Mobile Hotspots & Sticks rate apply. This is significant as the Hub rate is $90.00 for 20 GB versus a Mobile Hotspot rate of $85.00 for 10 GB. Both plans charge $10 per GB for usage in excess of their maximum fixed rate.

More information about the Mobile Hotspot can be found at the following sites:





Monday, 2 June 2014

Where are the Rocket Hubs?

There is something strange going on with the Rocket Hub on the Rogers and Tbaytel websites - it has disappeared! There is no longer a picture or technical information about the data hub hardware on either site.

On the Rogers mobile Internet page there is an icon for "Hub" as one of the four devices for mobile Internet. When you click on "View all" pricing information comes up. If you follow this by clicking the "Get started" button, the following message comes up:   

"Unfortunately, the phone you are looking for is not available for purchase on www.rogers.com."

Rogers is still listing two Flex Rate plan options for hubs on their mobile rate plan page.   


On the Tbaytel portable Internet page there is no mention of the Rocket Hub in the body of the page. The fine print at the bottom of the page refers to "Rocket Hub." The page lists details of a Data Flex plan for the "Rocket Stick" but there is no indication as to whether to not the plan applies to a Rocket Hub.

Neither the Rogers nor the Tbaytel site give any indication why they removed the Rocket Hub information or what the impact would be on existing or future customers.

A quick check confirmed that current data hub users are not experiencing any issues with their service at this time  except for the usual congestion. 

The lost of the data hub service without an equivalent replacement would have a major negative impact on the broadband (high-speed Internet) service in rural and remote areas of the Algoma District.

As of today, 02 Jun 2014, the alternative to the data hub is the Rogers Mobile Hotspot or Rocket Stick both of which are more expensive and do not offer a telephone option. Tbaytel offer the same Rocket Stick but at a slightly better Data flex plan price.



Saturday, 31 May 2014

SSM Airport Bell Deferral Account Cell Site

This is a picture of the Bell cell site located at the Pointe Des ChĂȘnes campground. While the original plans called for a monopole, the installed site is obviously a standard self-support model.





Monday, 26 May 2014

Bell Deferral Account Announcement Coming Soon

It looks like Bell will be formally announcing the roll out of the Deferral Account project within the next few weeks. It will be done as a combined release covering all the Deferral Account areas.

At a speech before the Canadian Club of Montreal on 26 May 2014, Bell CEO George Cope stated, "We've already begun to roll out, but we're actually going to announce over the coming month or so all the different markets...right across the country."

Exactly what the announcement will include was unclear except for the reference to the different markets. I hope that details of the service will be made clear as well.

One disconcerting note was the reference to having the project completed by the end of 2015 instead of the deadline of 31 Aug 2014 imposed by the CRTC. A couple of the quarterly reports submitted by Bell to the CRTC did identify a few Deferral Account areas where they were having problems acquiring tower sites and installing backhaul fibre optic cable. Bell did not identify any of the Algoma District Deferral Account areas as problematic.


Bell did not provide a specific date when they would make the follow-up announcement.  

Wednesday, 21 May 2014

Congestion Continues to Plague Wireless Networks

Any user in the Algoma Distriact who relies on the existing wireless systems, be they mobile (data hubs) or fixed wireless as their principle means of connecting to the Internet realizes that system congestion is at the point where on occasion the network becomes unusable. Part of the reason for this is the existing networks in Northern Ontario were designed to handle voice communications and to a certain extent Short Message Service (SMS) text processing. Wide-ranging data handing capability using data hub technology was almost an afterthought feature that from its onset stressed the network.

The rapid expansion of data intensive applications such as video, VoIP phone service and gaming caught many network designers and engineers off guard in spite of numerous warnings from hardware manufacturers and technology gurus that foresaw double-digit growth demand for data capacity over the last ten years. The result is network congestion that is now having a serious negative impact on how the average customer uses the network.

There have been recent occasions when I have disconnected from my fixed wireless system and reconnected to the Internet via dial-up because it was faster than the congested over-the-air system.  Of course, I lose some functionality on my Local Area Network (LAN) and restrict image download but at least I can get some basic work done in a reasonable period. 

In theory, and it may be a big "if", the Deferral Account based system that Bell plans to activate in selected areas during the summer of 2014 will not have the same congestion issues as the existing networks. The main reason for this is that Bell designed the Deferral Account system from its inception as primarily a network to deliver broadband (high-speed Internet) data connectivity with traditional voice and SMS as a side benefit.

Bell conducted extensive field trails in diverse locations starting in 2012. The network designers adopted some of the observations and results from these trials into the final design. This included the number of towers and cell sites (hereafter sites) needed to service a rural population density ratio, distances between sites and customer locations, number of channels at each site and the need for external antennas at the customer location to name just a few.

In one particular Deferral Account area, there are seven Bell sites while the competition has coverage from four sites for the same area.  Admittedly, there are major differences in frequencies being used, tower locations, antenna design and other technology which may account for some of the difference in the number of sites. On the other hand, designers need to take into account terrain features, population density, and customer demand when deciding on the number of sites covering a specific area at an acceptable level.

At the predicted growth of demand for data connectivity becomes a reality, congestion will continue to be a problem on mobile and wireless based networks unless network providers take steps to reduce its impact. This growth is a worldwide phenomenon as shown in the Cisco Visual Networking Index (VNI) Forecast update.  These radio based systems use a shared spectrum infrastructure and as demand for bandwidth increases, the amount available to each individual users decreases which eventually results in gridlock and ultimately in shutdown of the network.  

Internet Service Providers (ISP) need to address the congestion issue on an ongoing basis and not wait until the situation becomes a crisis.  They need to be proactive, get out ahead of the bow wave and not wait to react to an unacceptable state of affairs. They need to use all the techniques available to them to reduce congestion to acceptable levels. These techniques and actions can include, inter alia, splitting cells, adding new sites, and increasing the number of access points, reassigning spectrum usage, increase backhaul capacity. Rather than pay higher dividends, ISPs need to be prepared it put more money back into the networks to keep pace with advances in technology and customer demand.    








Sunday, 4 May 2014

Xplornet Announces Satellite Capacity on ViaSat-2

Xplornet Communications Inc recently announced that it contracted for all the Canadian residential capacity on the new ViaSat-2 satellite. Boeing Space and Intelligence Systems is building the new KA based bird. It is scheduled for launch in mid-2016. 

This new capacity is in addition to and almost double the Canadian capacity Xplornet currently has on ViaSat-1. To get a feel for the overall capacity of the two satellites, ViaSat-2 has 2.5 times the capacity of the existing ViaSat-1. Assuming a 12 Mbps download service speed, ViaSat-2 could theoretically handle 2.5 million users versus ViaSat-1's one million users. Put another way, ViaSat-2 could handle one million users at 30 Mbps.

While Xplornet controls, under lease arrangements, the Canadian capacity of ViaSat-1, Exede is a prime user of the system in the United States. A February 2013 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) report listed Exede as exceeding its advertised 12 Mbps download speed 137% of the time. This was the highest percentage amongst the major ISPs tested.  I have been unable to find any similar studies for ViaSat-1/Xplornet in Canada.

ViaSat -2 Footprint

Returning to ViaSat-2 , the overall coverage outline is different from conventional previous patterns. It covers the major transatlantic air and sea routes as well as the major Caribbean  cruise ship areas. This will enable ViaSat to offer satellite based Internet connectivity to these major industries.
  

With the two ViaSat satellites operational, Xplornet should be able handle the congestion and capacity issues that have plagued it in the past. Unfortunately, the commissioning of ViaSat-2 is still a considerable time in the future.

Thursday, 24 April 2014

Is 4G Satellite Coming to the Algoma District?

Word on the street has it that Xplornet is in the process of transitioning Northern Ontario broadband (high-speed Internet) satellite coverage from the tired Hughes and Telesat Ka[1] satellites  to the newer  4G[2] High Throughput Satellite (HTS) - either ViaSat or Jupiter. While the 4G satellites are also Ka band, they use different transponder technology to get the higher throughput. The most noticeable difference is the use of spot beams. I posted previously more information about the HTS satellite services at these blog entries - Next Generation Satellites and ViaSat Impact on Algoma District

If the plan to introduce 4G satellite goes ahead, the immediate consequence will be universal coverage of the District, reduced costs and increased data caps. Based on the prices charged in other jurisdiction across Canada, one could reasonably expect prices and service in the following ranges[3]:





When compared to the existing 3G satellite service on Telesat, there is quite an improvement in all categories.



One of the biggest complaints about satellite service over the years has been the "Fair Use Policy" or FUP. This policy limited the amount of data an individual user station could exchange (down and up) over a designated period.  After the user exceeded the data limit, the Internet Service Provider (ISP) throttled back the speed of the connectivity for a fixed period lasting anywhere from 15 minutes to 24 hours, depending on the service category.[4]  Xplornet now calls the practice Traffic Management. A full list and explanation of the variations is available at this page on the Xplornet website.

Another common complaint is a slowdown in speed during peak hours. This complaint is common to all wireless, shared bandwidth systems, be they satellite, fixed wireless (Canopy) or cellular.  Commonly called congestion, it is too many users chasing too little bandwidth.  Put another way, ISPs oversell their available capacity without regard to how the customer is using the system. As the demand for streaming video and cloud storage services grow, it takes fewer users to overwhelm existing systems.

There is a good chance that the 4G satellite will follow a well-established progression. Early adopters will be very pleased with the speed and availability of the satellite service. As the word spreads about the service, more customers sign up. Over time, the service quality gradually declines as the system receives more and more demand. Eventually, using the system becomes an exercise in frustration.

Finally, the 4G satellites will not solve the latency, (sometimes referred to as time-delay or ping time) problem. Like previous satellites, the 4G birds are in geosynchronous orbit, which means there is a minimum latency in the order of 600 ms in round trip signal time.  The general acceptance is that any latency in excess of around 250 ms will play havoc with applications that require near real-time connectivity such as gaming, VoIP and some secure Virtual Private Networks (VPN). Although there have been marked improvements in how latency is handled, it is still problem that needs to be considered by some users.

None of the above is to say that satellite broadband does not have its place in the bag of broadband solutions. In some cases, it is and will continue to be the only solution for some remote area such as fly-in camps, industrial operations[5] and isolated seasonal residence such as those along the Algoma Central Railway (ACR).  There are also small residential pockets which non-satellite ISPs do not consider economically viable.

As a matter of note, the current federal and provincial policy is to consider satellite broadband as an acceptable means of providing broadband access. In fact, ten of the projects approved in the last iteration of the Broadband Canada program (2012) relied on the use of satellite as the delivery method. (The majority were fixed wireless.)

Whether satellite broadband is a viable solution depends on how the customer wants to use the connectivity. I used the older (and slower) satellite service for over seven years and found it satisfied the majority of my needs. However, I am not a gamer nor do I view a lot of video. I did use it extensively for e-mail, web browsing, project management, academic research, government services interaction and miscellaneous this and that. Once I got use to time lag in the initial the click to display action - the latency bug-a-boo issue- it worked fine for me.

The decision as to whether or not to subscribe to a satellite service is very much a personal one based the customer's needs.





[1] The frequency range used for download and upload classifies Satellites:   C-Band - 4-8 GHz); Ku Band - 12-18 GHz; Ka Band - 26.5-40 GHz. The higher the frequency means the smaller the dish size.

[2] Satellite 4G should not be confused with cellular 4G networks. They are different technology.
[3] I copied this from the Xplornet website in Feb 2014 for service in Alberta and New Brunswick.
[4] This is the same trick used by some cellular service providers that offer "unlimited data". After a core cap of anywhere from 2-4 GB at 4G speeds, any data  overages are throttled back to 3G or even 2G speeds in some cases.
[5] There are dedicated commercial satellite ground stations operators that can provide better quality service than some residential quality ISPs.