Wednesday, 21 May 2014

Congestion Continues to Plague Wireless Networks

Any user in the Algoma Distriact who relies on the existing wireless systems, be they mobile (data hubs) or fixed wireless as their principle means of connecting to the Internet realizes that system congestion is at the point where on occasion the network becomes unusable. Part of the reason for this is the existing networks in Northern Ontario were designed to handle voice communications and to a certain extent Short Message Service (SMS) text processing. Wide-ranging data handing capability using data hub technology was almost an afterthought feature that from its onset stressed the network.

The rapid expansion of data intensive applications such as video, VoIP phone service and gaming caught many network designers and engineers off guard in spite of numerous warnings from hardware manufacturers and technology gurus that foresaw double-digit growth demand for data capacity over the last ten years. The result is network congestion that is now having a serious negative impact on how the average customer uses the network.

There have been recent occasions when I have disconnected from my fixed wireless system and reconnected to the Internet via dial-up because it was faster than the congested over-the-air system.  Of course, I lose some functionality on my Local Area Network (LAN) and restrict image download but at least I can get some basic work done in a reasonable period. 

In theory, and it may be a big "if", the Deferral Account based system that Bell plans to activate in selected areas during the summer of 2014 will not have the same congestion issues as the existing networks. The main reason for this is that Bell designed the Deferral Account system from its inception as primarily a network to deliver broadband (high-speed Internet) data connectivity with traditional voice and SMS as a side benefit.

Bell conducted extensive field trails in diverse locations starting in 2012. The network designers adopted some of the observations and results from these trials into the final design. This included the number of towers and cell sites (hereafter sites) needed to service a rural population density ratio, distances between sites and customer locations, number of channels at each site and the need for external antennas at the customer location to name just a few.

In one particular Deferral Account area, there are seven Bell sites while the competition has coverage from four sites for the same area.  Admittedly, there are major differences in frequencies being used, tower locations, antenna design and other technology which may account for some of the difference in the number of sites. On the other hand, designers need to take into account terrain features, population density, and customer demand when deciding on the number of sites covering a specific area at an acceptable level.

At the predicted growth of demand for data connectivity becomes a reality, congestion will continue to be a problem on mobile and wireless based networks unless network providers take steps to reduce its impact. This growth is a worldwide phenomenon as shown in the Cisco Visual Networking Index (VNI) Forecast update.  These radio based systems use a shared spectrum infrastructure and as demand for bandwidth increases, the amount available to each individual users decreases which eventually results in gridlock and ultimately in shutdown of the network.  

Internet Service Providers (ISP) need to address the congestion issue on an ongoing basis and not wait until the situation becomes a crisis.  They need to be proactive, get out ahead of the bow wave and not wait to react to an unacceptable state of affairs. They need to use all the techniques available to them to reduce congestion to acceptable levels. These techniques and actions can include, inter alia, splitting cells, adding new sites, and increasing the number of access points, reassigning spectrum usage, increase backhaul capacity. Rather than pay higher dividends, ISPs need to be prepared it put more money back into the networks to keep pace with advances in technology and customer demand.    








Sunday, 4 May 2014

Xplornet Announces Satellite Capacity on ViaSat-2

Xplornet Communications Inc recently announced that it contracted for all the Canadian residential capacity on the new ViaSat-2 satellite. Boeing Space and Intelligence Systems is building the new KA based bird. It is scheduled for launch in mid-2016. 

This new capacity is in addition to and almost double the Canadian capacity Xplornet currently has on ViaSat-1. To get a feel for the overall capacity of the two satellites, ViaSat-2 has 2.5 times the capacity of the existing ViaSat-1. Assuming a 12 Mbps download service speed, ViaSat-2 could theoretically handle 2.5 million users versus ViaSat-1's one million users. Put another way, ViaSat-2 could handle one million users at 30 Mbps.

While Xplornet controls, under lease arrangements, the Canadian capacity of ViaSat-1, Exede is a prime user of the system in the United States. A February 2013 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) report listed Exede as exceeding its advertised 12 Mbps download speed 137% of the time. This was the highest percentage amongst the major ISPs tested.  I have been unable to find any similar studies for ViaSat-1/Xplornet in Canada.

ViaSat -2 Footprint

Returning to ViaSat-2 , the overall coverage outline is different from conventional previous patterns. It covers the major transatlantic air and sea routes as well as the major Caribbean  cruise ship areas. This will enable ViaSat to offer satellite based Internet connectivity to these major industries.
  

With the two ViaSat satellites operational, Xplornet should be able handle the congestion and capacity issues that have plagued it in the past. Unfortunately, the commissioning of ViaSat-2 is still a considerable time in the future.

Thursday, 24 April 2014

Is 4G Satellite Coming to the Algoma District?

Word on the street has it that Xplornet is in the process of transitioning Northern Ontario broadband (high-speed Internet) satellite coverage from the tired Hughes and Telesat Ka[1] satellites  to the newer  4G[2] High Throughput Satellite (HTS) - either ViaSat or Jupiter. While the 4G satellites are also Ka band, they use different transponder technology to get the higher throughput. The most noticeable difference is the use of spot beams. I posted previously more information about the HTS satellite services at these blog entries - Next Generation Satellites and ViaSat Impact on Algoma District

If the plan to introduce 4G satellite goes ahead, the immediate consequence will be universal coverage of the District, reduced costs and increased data caps. Based on the prices charged in other jurisdiction across Canada, one could reasonably expect prices and service in the following ranges[3]:





When compared to the existing 3G satellite service on Telesat, there is quite an improvement in all categories.



One of the biggest complaints about satellite service over the years has been the "Fair Use Policy" or FUP. This policy limited the amount of data an individual user station could exchange (down and up) over a designated period.  After the user exceeded the data limit, the Internet Service Provider (ISP) throttled back the speed of the connectivity for a fixed period lasting anywhere from 15 minutes to 24 hours, depending on the service category.[4]  Xplornet now calls the practice Traffic Management. A full list and explanation of the variations is available at this page on the Xplornet website.

Another common complaint is a slowdown in speed during peak hours. This complaint is common to all wireless, shared bandwidth systems, be they satellite, fixed wireless (Canopy) or cellular.  Commonly called congestion, it is too many users chasing too little bandwidth.  Put another way, ISPs oversell their available capacity without regard to how the customer is using the system. As the demand for streaming video and cloud storage services grow, it takes fewer users to overwhelm existing systems.

There is a good chance that the 4G satellite will follow a well-established progression. Early adopters will be very pleased with the speed and availability of the satellite service. As the word spreads about the service, more customers sign up. Over time, the service quality gradually declines as the system receives more and more demand. Eventually, using the system becomes an exercise in frustration.

Finally, the 4G satellites will not solve the latency, (sometimes referred to as time-delay or ping time) problem. Like previous satellites, the 4G birds are in geosynchronous orbit, which means there is a minimum latency in the order of 600 ms in round trip signal time.  The general acceptance is that any latency in excess of around 250 ms will play havoc with applications that require near real-time connectivity such as gaming, VoIP and some secure Virtual Private Networks (VPN). Although there have been marked improvements in how latency is handled, it is still problem that needs to be considered by some users.

None of the above is to say that satellite broadband does not have its place in the bag of broadband solutions. In some cases, it is and will continue to be the only solution for some remote area such as fly-in camps, industrial operations[5] and isolated seasonal residence such as those along the Algoma Central Railway (ACR).  There are also small residential pockets which non-satellite ISPs do not consider economically viable.

As a matter of note, the current federal and provincial policy is to consider satellite broadband as an acceptable means of providing broadband access. In fact, ten of the projects approved in the last iteration of the Broadband Canada program (2012) relied on the use of satellite as the delivery method. (The majority were fixed wireless.)

Whether satellite broadband is a viable solution depends on how the customer wants to use the connectivity. I used the older (and slower) satellite service for over seven years and found it satisfied the majority of my needs. However, I am not a gamer nor do I view a lot of video. I did use it extensively for e-mail, web browsing, project management, academic research, government services interaction and miscellaneous this and that. Once I got use to time lag in the initial the click to display action - the latency bug-a-boo issue- it worked fine for me.

The decision as to whether or not to subscribe to a satellite service is very much a personal one based the customer's needs.





[1] The frequency range used for download and upload classifies Satellites:   C-Band - 4-8 GHz); Ku Band - 12-18 GHz; Ka Band - 26.5-40 GHz. The higher the frequency means the smaller the dish size.

[2] Satellite 4G should not be confused with cellular 4G networks. They are different technology.
[3] I copied this from the Xplornet website in Feb 2014 for service in Alberta and New Brunswick.
[4] This is the same trick used by some cellular service providers that offer "unlimited data". After a core cap of anywhere from 2-4 GB at 4G speeds, any data  overages are throttled back to 3G or even 2G speeds in some cases.
[5] There are dedicated commercial satellite ground stations operators that can provide better quality service than some residential quality ISPs. 

Saturday, 19 April 2014

Bell Deferral Account Report Released 17 Apr 2014

The latest Bell Deferral Account quarterly status report was released through the CRTC website  on 17 Apr 2014. This report covered the period Jan to Mar 2014 and like previous reports was heavily redacted with much of the information of value to potential customers blacked out under the pretence of "competitive information."  (I am sure the new cell site in Wawa, Goulais and St. Joseph Island would go completely unnoticed by the competition unless they were identified in the report.)

There were no problems or delay identified for the Algoma District Deferral Account areas and the previously published activation schedule still applies:

Deferral Account Area
Activation Date*
Echo Bay
31 Aug 2014
Goulais
31 Jul 2014
SSM-Airport
31 Jul 2014
St. Joseph Island
30 Jun 2014
Wawa
31 Jul 2014
                        Latest planned date. Could be earlier if all is ready
 By way of clarification these dates apply to the activation and availability  of the special Deferral Account service rates . Most of the tower and associated cell sites  in Goulais, St. Joseph Island and Wawa are completed and are operating in a normal fashion as part of the standard Bell Mobility network. This means that anyone using a data hub or a data stick connected through these new sites constructed as part of the Deferral Account project are currently paying the normal rates.

I am not sure of the policy that will apply after the Deferral Account service rates become available: will customers be moved onto the new rate plan immediately or will they be transferred only after their existing agreement expires? 

Below is the proposed rate structure accepted  by the CRTC for HSPA+ wireless based version of Bell Deferral Account service.( The original proposal back around 2004 called for a DSL based solution.) It has been fined tuned over the years: - the activation fees has been waived and the monthly rental fees dropped. For some reason, Bell is keeping the details very close to the chest. Bottom line is that $46.95 + plus tax ( $41.95 Home Zone Wireless Plus + the $5.00 insurance for an extra 40 GB), one can get 65 GB. 



Proposed HSPA+ Retail Broadband Services
Province
Ontario
Service Name
Home Zone Wireless
Home Zone
Wireless Plus
Monthly Rate
$31.95
$41.95
Download Speed
Up to 2Mbps
Up to 7 Mbps
Upload Speed
Up to 1 Mbps
Up to 3 Mbps
Monthly Usage Allowance
2 GB
25 GB
Monthly Charge for Additional Usage
$2.50/GB, maximum of $30 per month
Usage Insurance
$5.00 per month for extra 40 GB
Activation Fee
$29.95
Hardware
Turbo Hub: $3.95 monthly rental fee
Term
Monthly

The final rate structure is not readily available at this time but a Bell representative accidently quoted a basic rate of $37.95 for 20GB to customer in East Algoma but quickly withdrew the offer saying the plan was not available in the customer's area.

 Even though there are area in other parts of Ontario where the plan has been launched, there is nothing on the Bell website and I have not been able to get hold of the plan's official  rate structure. Unlike the tower/site locations redacted in the report, I accept the rate structure as legitimate "competitive information" at this time.

Bell will be conducting a marketing campaign with more detail once the service is ready to accept customers.


 The other big unknown is how will the other cellular service suppliers react to the new competition.  Will they match the new rates for their data hub services?

Sunday, 13 April 2014

St Joseph Island Cell Activation

Bell has activated the Deferral Account sites on St. Joseph Island but there is no indication that they are yet offering Deferral Account service. See http://goo.gl/6lnF2l for additional details.

Deferral Account service is supposed to be considerably less expensive than their conventional data hub offering.  

Deferral Account service is scheduled to become available later this summer. Potential user contemplating getting access to the new service now need to ask if they will be eligible for Deferral Account rates, when it will be available and can they convert to the new Deferral Account rate plans without penalty when they become available. Be sure to get the answer in writing and the ID of the Bell employee providing the information. 

Wednesday, 19 February 2014

Outcome of 700 MHz Auction Canada 2014

Industry Canada announced the winners of the 700 MHz frequency spectrum auction on February 19, 2014.

The big winner in Northern Ontario appears to be Bell Canada who purchased 4 blocks. The big loser was Tbaytel who was shut out.  Bragg (who operates as Eastlink), Rogers and Telus each got a single block.  

Here is the breakdown of the results that affect the Algoma District which is part of the Northern Ontario covered by Auction Area 2-09 is shown on this map:



Band
Frequencies
Paired or Unpaired
Bandwidth
Company
A
698-704 MHz/728-734 MHz
Paired
6+6 MHz
Bell
B
704-710 MHz/734-740 MHz
Paired
6+6 MHz
Bell
C
710-716 MHz/740-746 MHz
Paired
6+6 MHz
Rogers
C1
777-782 MHz/746-751 MHz
Paired
5+5 MHz
Bragg (Eastlink)
C2
782-787 MHz/751-756 MHz
Paired
5+5 MHz
Telus
D
716-722 MHz
Unpaired
6 MHz
Bell
E
716-722 MHz
Unpaired
6 MHz
Bell







Over the next few days, I will examine the impact the of the auction results and post my impressions  in due course. 

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

CRTC Inquiry Into Satellite Transport Services

The CRTC quietly issued Telecom Notice of Consultation CRTC 2014-44 on 06 Feb 2014 entitled:

"Appointment of an Inquiry Officer to review matters related to transport services provided by satellite”

Commissioner Candice Molnar will conduct “an inquiry with respect to the Canadian marketplace for satellite services that are used by telecommunications service providers (TSPs) to provide telecommunications services to Canadians.”  One way to look at TSPs is to consider them the last mile service providers.

The inquiry will look at both sides of the satellite provisioning issue;

Satellite perspective. The satellite services provided by satellite operators to the TSPs covering such items as: who they are; rates the TSPs pay; technical limitations; current and future satellite capacity; future technology; and CRTC framework for the satellite services.

TSPs perspective. Indentify TSPs that use satellite services; TSPs operating areas; the numbers of customers who have access to their services and the numbers of customers they serve; delivered services; and end-users service limitations.

The high cost of satellite backhaul service was a recurring theme in the recent CRTC hearings about Northwestel regulatory framework and Modernization Plan (the Northwestel proceedings). In particular, many of the intervenors placed much of the blame for the high cost providing reasonably priced Internet access to remote communities on the high cost of satellite transport.

While the satellite technology exists that can provide a service that compares favourably with terrestrial based systems used in the urban and suburban environment, the amount of bandwidth required it provide reasonable capacity is either not available or prohibitively expensive and in lot of cases a combination of both.

Unfortunately, the inquiry will not address issues relating to satellite services that satellite operators provide directly to end-users, it should cover services provided by the self styled “Canada's leading provider of rural broadband” TSP – Xplornet.

The inquiry is scheduled to be completed by October 2014.